Governance – Creative Administration

Updates to the Society Org Chart

At the April meeting of the Board of Directors, following a good deal of members feedback, a proposal was ratified to promote the office of the Chatelaine from a deputy to a full Society officer, and to add a new Society officer for Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging (DEIB).

As part of this update, the previous Corporate office of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging office was named the Office of Inclusive Programs.

I assume the Society’s Governing Documents will be updated soon to reflect these changes.

I’ve updated my org chart to reflect these developments, as well as two corrections to the version I assembled in December:

An Early Edition of the Society’s Governing Documents

The Society for Creative Anachronism is governed by a collection of documents known as the Organizational Handbook, which includes both the bylaws of the modern-day not-for-profit corporation (SCA, Inc.) and the policies that govern the “in-game” historical re-creation activities and the volunteer bureaucracy that supports it (“Corpora”).

These documents emerged incrementally over the first decade of the Society, as the initial leadership established a structure for the organization. Bylaws were established in 1969 and supplemented over the following years by a body of decisions made by the Board referred to as Corpora. By 1979 the framework had taken on a recognizable form organized along similar lines to the rules we use today.

Society Membership Trends

During a recent discussion of levels of Society participation, I was asked about long-term trends in overall membership numbers.

As it happens, I had previously extracted some of the relevant figures from other sources — some of which showed up in a post about kingdom-level breakdowns — but hadn’t gotten around to publishing the older numbers here, because the data is incomplete and would benefit from additional review and cleanup.

That said, even if the specific numbers are taken with a grain of salt, the overall pattern shown here is likely of interest to others, so I might as well share this as a work-in-progress.

In Support of the East Kingdom Rapier Crown Variance

Earlier this month, the East Kingdom’s royals submitted a request for a variance that would allow the Spring 2024 crown tournament to be determined via a rapier contest rather than rattan armored combat as has been the practice for the last five decades.

Corporate and Society Inclusion Offices

The Board is soliciting feedback on a change to the governing documents that would affect DEIB efforts.

It looks like they are both creating a DEIB Society Officer (who would coordinate in-game kingdom and local DEIB offices), and separating that office from the Corporate Office of Inclusive Programs (which would be focused on corporate and Board support).

Lowering the Bar for Confirmation of New Board Members

At the July quarterly Board meeting, a proposal was made to reduce the requirement of unanimous support for new directors to unanimous-minus-one, and the membership was asked for feedback on the idea.

This seems like a small step in the right direction — for many years that there has been a concern that the Board was too insular and insufficiently responsive to new ideas from the populace, and allowing any sitting member to unilaterally veto a candidate makes change extremely difficult.

I think more sweeping changes are needed, but we shouldn’t let a quest for revolutionary utopia throw up hurdles to incremental improvement, so I’ve written to the Board in support of the proposal.

An SCA Governance Org Chart

While working up some feedback on a draft Society policy document, I noticed a reference to the SCA’s “Corporate Officers” and was reminded of the fact that I didn’t have a clear understanding of the distinction between Corporate Officers, Society Officers, and other members of the organization’s central leadership team — categories that I would like to be able to explain to folks here in my local branch.

I posted in the SCA’s “unofficial” Facebook group and soon had useful pointers from Cormac Mór and John the Bearkiller.

As I should have guessed, the answers can be found in a careful reading of the Society’s Governing Documents. The SCA, Inc corporate officers are listed in the Corporate Bylaws paragraph VII.A.1, while the Society officers are listed in Corpora section VI.

Society Documents May Be Shared

The SCA has a legitimate interest in avoiding confusion around its policies that could be caused by the widespread publication of incomplete or out-of-date documents. To further this goal, it instructs officers in kingdoms and local branches to link to the canonical documents on SCA.org rather than hosting copies on their own websites — this way, there’s no chance that someone might be misled by reading an old copy of Corpora or an office handbook that has been since been superseded.

But I wanted to make sure that this policy would not be construed in such a way as to prevent amateur historians of the Society from sharing and discussing old versions of these documents, so I penned an inquiry to the Society’s leadership.

Reassuringly, I’ve received an answer from the Society President stating that these are “public documents” and may be shared as long as steps are taken to minimize the chances of confusion.

Correspondence on this topic is appended below.

From: Mathghamhain Ua Ruadháin To: Society Seneschal Cc: Society In-House Counsel, Society President Date: 18 August 2023

Greetings from the East,

I have a policy-related question that I hope you can help with: would any harm be caused by sharing an archive of previous editions of the Society’s governing documents?

I ask because the following sentence appears on the front page of the Organizational Handbook: “The contents of this document will be posted at http://www.sca.org and further reproduction on other Internet sites is expressly forbidden.”

I assume the prohibition stems from a concern that having multiple copies of the governing documents floating around on various websites could cause confusion if someone were to refer to an out-of-date edition that had been posted to some third-party location.

However, given the interest in possible revisions to Corpora and the Bylaws, I think there is a real value to our membership in making earlier versions of the governing documents available for easy reference so that people can see what has changed over time.

Therefore, I have collected a batch of sixteen historical versions of the organizational handbook from the last two decades, and would like to post them for public review. Before doing so, I plan to watermark each page by overlaying a message that clearly indicates that this is a non-canonical document for historical reference only, and directing people to visit SCA.org to obtain the current governing documents.

Can you see any way in which this would harm the interests of the Society?

Thank you for your consideration,

— Mathghamhain Ua Ruadháin

From: Mathghamhain Ua Ruadháin To: Society Seneschal Cc: Society In-House Counsel, Society President, Board Ombudsman for Corporate Office Date: 23 September 2023

Hello,

I’m checking in because a month has passed without a reply to this question.

Would any harm be done if I posted an archive of old versions of the Society’s governing documents, clearly labeled to show they were out of date and for historical reference only?

Thank you,

— Mathghamhain Ua Ruadháin

From: Society President To: Mathghamhain Ua Ruadháin Cc: Society Seneschal, Society In-House Counsel, Board Ombudsman for Corporate Office Date: 25 September 2023

Hello Matthew,

We very much appreciate your interest in this area and concur with your basic analysis. We feel that the risk of confusion from having the old versions published may possibly outweigh the value of being able to look at the evolution. There is a concern that someone may look at an outdated version of one of our documents and rely on a section that has since been amended. But all of these versions are public documents and as such are in the public domain.

It is appreciated that if you do put these up that all of the past versions are clearly marked as such and that wherever the placement is done that area be clearly designated as not an official site of SCA, Inc.

Your watermark plan should help prevent any confusion.

In service,

John

Three Black Directors Resigned from the SCA’s Board In Six Months

During a period of half a year, three members of the Society’s Board of Directors resigned in succession. Resignations from the Board are not unknown, but they are uncommon; I believe the last one before these three was around a decade ago.

The reasons in each case were different, and I am not aware of any overall narrative that ties them all together, but it is notable (and unfortunate) that in a Society that is overwhelmingly white but struggling to be more inclusive, all three of the directors who resigned were Black.

Ansteorran Prince Removed After Problematic Overture

On the last weekend of August, the Crown Prince of Ansteorra (the SCA kingdom that covers Oklahoma and most of Texas) attended the coronation of the new prince and princess of the kingdom of Álendia. The Ansteorran Prince was there as an invited guest, honored as a visiting royal, and made a short speech to “extend an olive branch” to their populace.

Society royals visit other kingdoms all the time, but Álendia isn’t part of the SCA — it’s the sole kingdom of SMA, the Society of the Middle Ages, a splinter group formed in 2021 by folks who felt the SCA was “too woke.” While there are some interesting elements in their organization, the primary difference is one of modern politics: SMA is a haven for MAGA folks, including anti-maskers, Euro-centrists, and those whose racism, misogyny, homophobic, or anti-trans bias leaves them out of synch with the SCA’s efforts to be more inclusive. Notably, among its earliest members are a number of people who were sanctioned or kicked out of the SCA via an R&D (Revocation of Membership and Denial of Participation), as well as their sympathizers.